#Health

Manifesto Section to
Reform Our UK Democracy

Yes, it's a Mess.
But it's not too Late!

Sign the Petition  

Health and the NHS - the Broken System and its Radical Reform

Why was the NHS introduced?

The NHS was created in response to the Beveridge Report (1942), which identified five major societal issues: Want, Disease, Ignorance, Squalor, and Idleness. The report proposed a comprehensive welfare system, including universal healthcare, to tackle these problems. The Labour government, led by Clement Attlee, passed the National Health Service Act (1946), with Aneurin Bevan, the Minister of Health, spearheading its implementation.

What is it now? Is it broken?
  • NHS 24/25 budget £192 billion and 20% of total government spend and has the following problems: Long Waiting Times: Patients are still experiencing delays for GP appointments, surgeries, and A&E treatment.
  • Staffing Shortages: The NHS workforce is stretched, with ongoing concerns about recruitment and retention.
  • Budget Pressures: The government is working to balance funding while ensuring resources are used effectively.
  • Emergency Care Struggles: A&E departments are overwhelmed, with long waits for ambulances and urgent care. Funding Pressures – Budget constraints make it difficult to invest in new technology and infrastructure. Mental Health Services – Demand for mental health support is rising, but resources remain limited.
The UK, When compared to other developed countries, has:
  • Less spending per capita on healthcare than many developed nations. In 2023, UK healthcare spending was £4,500 per person, compared to £6,500 in Germany and £10,000 in the US
  • Staffing Shortages: The NHS workforce is stretched, with ongoing concerns about recruitment and retention.
  • An NHS budget accounts for around 18-20% of total government spending, whereas Germany and France allocate closer to 25%.
  • Fewer hospital beds per 1,000 people (2.5) compared to Germany (8.0) and France (5.7).
  • Fewer MRI and CT scanners per capita, leading to longer diagnostic wait times.
  • lower cancer survival rates than many developed nations. Five-year survival rates for breast cancer are 85% in the UK, compared to 91% in Sweden.
  • The third-worst among 18 developed countries for avoidable deaths, meaning more people die from conditions that could have been treated.
  • Fewer doctors and nurses per capita than Germany, France, and Sweden, leading to staff shortages and longer waiting times
Overall Verdict

The NHS is efficient and accessible, but underfunding and resource shortages mean it struggles to match the healthcare outcomes of countries with higher spending and better infrastructure. What is the rest of the world doing?

It is probably fair to say that it is now a political “hot potato” that no politician wants to sort?
  • Governments operate on election cycles, typically every 4-5 years, meaning politicians prioritise quick wins over long-term healthcare reforms.
  • Major NHS changes—like restructuring or funding increases—often take decades to show results, but politicians need immediate successes to secure votes.
The Result ?

Instead of long-term, evidence-based improvements, the NHS often sees short-term political fixes that don’t fully address its challenges.

What’s the answer ?

Instead of long-term, evidence-based improvements, the NHS often sees short-term political fixes that don’t fully address its challenges.

Here’s a suggestion to start with...

History has shown that the most successful government projects are ones that are when done in joint venture with the private sector. Yes the private sector are in business to make money but with that goal comes better efficiencies and accountability that the government is not naturally guided by. A suggestion is to share the burden with the private sector so we can improve the NHS in a financially controllable way.

Second is that we all need to own our health better and not outsource this to someone else to put right when we get ill. So much of the NHS budget is spent on conditions that could have been avoided and sorted out before they became critical.

Here are two suggested initiatives that propose a potential solution to save our NHS and make us proud of it again!

Proposal for a Hybrid Healthcare Model in the UK

This proposal aims to modernise UK healthcare by shifting routine, non-emergency treatments to private healthcare, while keeping the NHS responsible for emergency care, childbirth, critical illnesses, and supporting vulnerable populations.

Key Features of the Proposed Model:

  • 1. NHS Focus Areas
  • Emergency & urgent care (A&E, critical conditions, ambulance services).
  • Childbirth & maternity services.
  • Emergency cancer treatment & life-threatening illnesses.
  • Coverage for vulnerable populations (uninsured, low-income individuals).
  • 2. Private Healthcare Expansion
  • Type 1: Existing private healthcare system (covers all medical needs for subscribers).
  • Type 2: New planned treatment model (covers scheduled surgeries, diagnostics, and non-urgent care).
  • 3. Tax Incentives
  • Coverage for vulnerable populations (uninsured, low-income individuals).
  • Zero tax after age 55, making private healthcare more accessible for older individuals.
Updated Cost Projections & Savings
Category Current Costs (2025) Proposed Reform
Total party income £192 billion ❌ £175-180 billion (lower demand) ✔︎
Private Healthcare Expansion £20 billion ❌ £30-40 billion (higher uptake) ✔︎
Employer Healthcare Tax Revenue £2-3 billion ❌ £1-1.5 billion (lower tax rate) ✔︎
NHS Emergency Care Spending £70 billion ❌ £85 billion (specialized focus) ✔︎
Estimated NHS Savings - ❌ £10-15 billion (reduced non-emergency care demand) ✔︎
Union donations Unlimited (via political funds, opt-out system) ❌ £1,000 cap, opt-in only, full member reporting ✔︎
Enforcement Electoral Commission, limited penalties ❌ Independent auditors with power to fine, ban, prosecute ✔︎
Refined NHS & Private Healthcare Per-Patient Spending
  • Average NHS spending per person: £3,850
  • Emergency care per patient: £2,100-£2,500
  • Routine & planned treatments per patient: £1,500-£1,800
  • Mental health services per patient: £1,200-£1,500
  • Average private healthcare spending per person: £1,750
  • Private insurance coverage per patient: £2,500-£3,200
  • Out-of-pocket private treatment costs: £1,200-£2,000
Potential Benefits
  • Reduced NHS strain – Shifts routine treatments to private providers, allowing NHS to focus on emergencies.
  • More patient choice – Individuals can choose between NHS emergency care or affordable private planned treatments.
  • Faster & more efficient care – Non-urgent procedures handled privately, reducing NHS wait times.
  • Economic growth – Encourages investment in private healthcare, expanding jobs & innovation.
  • Fairer taxation – Lower tax rates help businesses & individuals afford private healthcare options.
Potential Challenges & Solutions

Supported By:

  • Equity concerns – Ensure vulnerable populations still have access to NHS for essential services.
  • Private sector regulation – Prevent excessive costs or insurance price hikes.
  • NHS funding balance – New funding formula required to support emergency care & low-income patients.
UK Health Ownership Incentive Model

This proposal introduces a mandatory yet rewarding healthcare engagement system, designed to encourage individuals—particularly low-income and unemployed groups—to take responsibility for their health while ensuring equitable access to NHS services.

Core Framework
  • Mandatory Preventative Health Programs – To access fast-tracked NHS treatment, individuals must complete basic health activities (e.g., check-ups, screenings, lifestyle adjustments).
  • Gamified Engagement System – Participants earn points for completing health tasks, redeemable for priority appointments, wellness discounts, or tax benefits.
  • Gamified Engagement System – Participants earn points for completing health tasks, redeemable for priority appointments, wellness discounts, or tax benefits.
  • Community-Based & Digital Support – Accessible local health hubs, mobile clinics, and AI-driven coaching guide users through the process.
Tracking & Accessibility
  • NHS Health App Integration – Monitors participation and provides personalized recommendations.
  • Alternative Low-Tech Options – Paper-based participation for those without digital access.
  • Government Support for Vulnerable Groups – Financial aid ensures no one is excluded due to economic barriers.
Projected Impact
  • Reduced NHS waiting times – Encouraging preventative care lowers demand for non-urgent treatments.
  • Improved public health – Prioritising self-care, diet, and fitness reduces long-term costs.
  • Greater personal responsibility – Shifts focus from reactive to proactive healthcare.
  • Balanced funding model – NHS resources directed towards critical treatments and vulnerable groups, while private healthcare handles routine care.